On the contrary, my experience with Conda has been that, on balance, Conda improves the work rather than degrades it. In that case, you might think that a monolithic “Swiss-army knife” tool like Conda may involve some unacceptable tradeoffs. You may be familiar with the Unix philosophy of having a collection of small tools that each do a single job well. Finally, like PyEnv, Conda can install and keep separate versions of Python, so you can work out different versions or experiment with later releases.Īs you can see, Conda’s strength is that it handles tasks that would otherwise be three different tools to accomplish.Like the Python venv module, Conda lets you create and manage isolated environments and save the dependencies for that environments with other developers.Like Pip, Conda can install packages, and as we go forward, we will discuss the pros and cons of each as a package management tool.IMovie Replacements: The Best Alternatives to the iMovie Software This may seem like an unfair fight, three against one and all, but let me assure you, this match is more balanced than it looks. In the title, I told you this post would be a comparison of Conda with Pip, Venv, and Pyenv. Conda will isolate these from your “global” Python, so you won’t have to worry about conflicts. It also lets you install Python (and other tools), in addition to installing Python packages. Miniconda comes with a version of Python along with the libraries it needs to run. Incidentally, you don’t already need Python installed to do this (but it’s OK if you do). Once Miniconda is successfully installed, you should be able to run “ conda info” or “ conda -version” to verify you can see it on your path. Miniconda lets you select which of those tools you need, based on the same “conda” command line tool that Anaconda uses. The difference is that Anaconda is a massive Python distribution with a huge set of tools pre-installed. If you’re interested in trying out Conda, I recommend Miniconda unless you have a strong need to get Anaconda. “The nice thing about standards is that you have so many to choose from furthermore, if you do not like any of them, you can just wait for next year’s model.” AdvertisementsĪndrew S. Saving, Sharing, and Re-Creating Saved Environments.Creating Environments and Installing Packages.Installing Python Packages: Conda and Pip.This post will share the way I prefer now and why. Flushed with the pride of thinking one has ceased to do it wrong, I wrote about How to Install Python Packages the Right Way.Īs any cat skinner will tell you, however, there’s more than one right way to do it. Now a veteran of many requirements.txt files, I have system aliases that help me quickly create and activate virtual environments. Later, and for years since, I’ve used the Python venv module. In Java, one used Maven (at least for a time before Gradle and other Ivy-based tools muddied the waters). In contrast, as an experienced Java developer, I would have been horrified to download jar files (Java packages) and drop them into the system-wide Java lib directory. In all fairness to them, that’s what I did first when I started using Python, too, even though, at the time, I already had over a decade of software development experience. More than one person has told me that they don’t use virtual environments they just install packages using pip into their global Python environment. Let me give you another symptom of Python’s tooling. In response, someone had some good-natured fun at my expense because I wrote that because SymPy is “written entirely in Python, it’s easy to install and use.” Advertisements For example, I recently promoted my SymPy post in such a place. If you spend time on Python forums, you’ll find that even people who love Python think its package management tools are somewhat clunky compared to other languages.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |